Understanding ERC-4337 Gas Fees and Their Impact

In the realm of blockchain and cryptocurrency, transaction fees play a crucial role. Particularly on Ethereum and its derivatives, the concept of “gas” is key. But what exactly are ERC-4337 gas fees, and how do they compare to traditional wallets?

Basic Understanding of Gas Fees

Each blockchain has its unique fee structure. Ethereum, for instance, calculates ‘gas’ based on the computational and storage effort required for each transaction. These fees are paid in the native currency of the blockchain, like ETH for Ethereum.

Comparison with Traditional Wallets

Even though many Ethereum-based blockchains adopt a similar logic in calculating gas, there is a significant difference compared to traditional wallets. Transactions using ERC-4337 tend to be more expensive due to the need for contract calls. For example, an ERC-20 token transfer with ERC-4337 is only slightly more expensive compared to a native token transfer.

Rollups: A Solution for Lower Fees

The concept of rollups emerged as a solution for reducing fees. Rollups conduct transactions on a smaller, faster blockchain and then relay the data back to a main blockchain like Ethereum. This allows for quick and cheap transactions while leveraging the security of a larger network.

Calculating Gas Fees

Calculating gas fees for ERC-4337 involves several assumptions, such as creating ERC-4337 accounts and token transfers. From recent data, it’s evident that gas fees for ERC-4337 transactions vary depending on the blockchain used. For instance, gas fees on Ethereum Mainnet are higher compared to rollups like Optimism and Arbitrum.

Reducing Fees with ERC-4337

ERC-4337 offers unique methods for reducing gas fees. One of them is signature aggregation, which allows for data compression and significant cost reduction. This approach is still in development but promises higher cost efficiency.


ERC-4337 gas fees tend to be higher compared to traditional wallets, especially on Ethereum Mainnet. However, with innovations like rollups and signature aggregation, there’s significant potential to reduce these costs. Further development and wider adoption of these technologies could pave the way for more efficient and economical blockchain transactions. Moving forward, adaptation and innovation in the use of ERC-4337 could be key in balancing cost and security in the blockchain ecosystem.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here